Burnley

Position

#19

Matches

19

Points

12

Low Risk14
Actual Points
12
Expected Points
13.7
Goals For
20
xG: 17.3
Goals Against
37
xGA: 37.0

Actual vs Expected Performance

Performance Variance

-1.7
Underperforming0Overperforming

Results match underlying performance - sustainable

Regression Probability
7.4%

Likelihood that performance will revert to expected levels. Higher = more likely to regress (for overperformers) or improve (for underperformers).

Z-Score
-0.27

How unusual this variance is compared to all teams. Above +2 or below -2 indicates extreme performance deviation from the mean.

P-Value
0.787

Probability this variance is due to random chance. Below 0.05 (*) means statistically significant - not just luck.

Understanding These Statistics

Regression Probability

High % (70%+) = very likely to change. Low % (20%-) = performance is sustainable. This tells you if the current form will last.

Z-Score

Measures extremeness. +2.0 = top 2.5% (extremely lucky). -2.0 = bottom 2.5% (extremely unlucky). Between -1 and +1 = normal.

P-Value

Below 0.05 marked with * = less than 5% chance this is random. Above 0.05 = could just be normal variance, not a real pattern.

What This Means in Plain English

Burnley has earned 12 points from 19 matches (position #19).

However, based on the quality of chances they've created (17.3 xG) and conceded (37.0 xGA), statistical models predict they should have closer to 13.7 points (position #20).

This means their results closely match their underlying performance quality. They're getting roughly the points their chance creation and defense deserves. This is sustainable - no major regression or improvement expected based on luck alone.

Bottom line: Current position accurately reflects performance quality. Any improvement will require genuine tactical or squad upgrades, not just waiting for luck to change.

Strategic Recommendations

i

Key Insight: Expected position based on xG is #20, current position is #19.