Everton

Position

#8

Matches

19

Points

28

Critical Risk91
!

High Regression Risk - Results Flattering Performance

Warning: This team is getting better results than their underlying performance suggests they should. They have 28 points but based on chances created/allowed (xG), they should have closer to 22.4 points.

Why this matters: The 5.6 point difference is likely due to unsustainable finishing luck or goalkeeping. When performance normalizes (regression to mean), they could drop 4-5 points (70% probability).

Actual Points
28
Expected Points
22.4
Goals For
20
xG: 21.8
Goals Against
20
xGA: 26.8

Actual vs Expected Performance

Performance Variance

+5.6
Underperforming0Overperforming

Getting 5.6 more points than performance suggests - unsustainable (high regression risk)

Regression Probability
70.2%

Likelihood that performance will revert to expected levels. Higher = more likely to regress (for overperformers) or improve (for underperformers).

Z-Score
0.79

How unusual this variance is compared to all teams. Above +2 or below -2 indicates extreme performance deviation from the mean.

P-Value
0.430

Probability this variance is due to random chance. Below 0.05 (*) means statistically significant - not just luck.

Understanding These Statistics

Regression Probability

High % (70%+) = very likely to change. Low % (20%-) = performance is sustainable. This tells you if the current form will last.

Z-Score

Measures extremeness. +2.0 = top 2.5% (extremely lucky). -2.0 = bottom 2.5% (extremely unlucky). Between -1 and +1 = normal.

P-Value

Below 0.05 marked with * = less than 5% chance this is random. Above 0.05 = could just be normal variance, not a real pattern.

What This Means in Plain English

Everton has earned 28 points from 19 matches (position #8).

However, based on the quality of chances they've created (21.8 xG) and conceded (26.8 xGA), statistical models predict they should have closer to 22.4 points (position #14).

This means they're getting 5.6 more points than their performance suggests - likely due to exceptional finishing (converting low-quality chances) or outstanding goalkeeping (saving shots that typically go in). This level of luck is difficult to sustain. Expect results to worsen as finishing/goalkeeping normalizes.

Bottom line: Don't be fooled by current position. Performance quality suggests a drop is coming. Avoid panic buys - the issue isn't lack of talent, it's unsustainable luck running out.

Strategic Recommendations

!

Critical Risk: Monitor closely for regression. Avoid panic decisions if performance normalizes.

i

Key Insight: Expected position based on xG is #14, current position is #8.