Liverpool

Position

#4

Matches

19

Points

33

Moderate Risk49
Actual Points
33
Expected Points
31.4
Goals For
30
xG: 30.2
Goals Against
26
xGA: 22.5

Actual vs Expected Performance

Performance Variance

+1.6
Underperforming0Overperforming

Results match underlying performance - sustainable

Regression Probability
34.1%

Likelihood that performance will revert to expected levels. Higher = more likely to regress (for overperformers) or improve (for underperformers).

Z-Score
0.22

How unusual this variance is compared to all teams. Above +2 or below -2 indicates extreme performance deviation from the mean.

P-Value
0.829

Probability this variance is due to random chance. Below 0.05 (*) means statistically significant - not just luck.

Understanding These Statistics

Regression Probability

High % (70%+) = very likely to change. Low % (20%-) = performance is sustainable. This tells you if the current form will last.

Z-Score

Measures extremeness. +2.0 = top 2.5% (extremely lucky). -2.0 = bottom 2.5% (extremely unlucky). Between -1 and +1 = normal.

P-Value

Below 0.05 marked with * = less than 5% chance this is random. Above 0.05 = could just be normal variance, not a real pattern.

What This Means in Plain English

Liverpool has earned 33 points from 19 matches (position #4).

However, based on the quality of chances they've created (30.2 xG) and conceded (22.5 xGA), statistical models predict they should have closer to 31.4 points (position #4).

This means their results closely match their underlying performance quality. They're getting roughly the points their chance creation and defense deserves. This is sustainable - no major regression or improvement expected based on luck alone.

Bottom line: Current position accurately reflects performance quality. Any improvement will require genuine tactical or squad upgrades, not just waiting for luck to change.

Strategic Recommendations

i

Key Insight: Expected position based on xG is #4, current position is #4.