Wolves

Position

#20

Matches

19

Points

3

Low Risk0

Improvement Potential - Unlucky But Creating Quality

Good news: This team is getting worse results than their performance deserves. They have 3 points but based on chances created/allowed (xG), they should have closer to 18.4 points.

Why this matters: The 15.4 point gap suggests poor finishing luck or goalkeeping errors. Natural improvement likely as performance normalizes - potential to gain 8-11 points without major changes to tactics or squad.

Actual Points
3
Expected Points
18.4
Goals For
11
xG: 17.2
Goals Against
40
xGA: 27.7

Actual vs Expected Performance

Performance Variance

-15.4
Underperforming0Overperforming

Getting 15.4 fewer points than performance suggests - unlucky (natural improvement expected)

Regression Probability
10.0%

Likelihood that performance will revert to expected levels. Higher = more likely to regress (for overperformers) or improve (for underperformers).

Z-Score
-2.28

How unusual this variance is compared to all teams. Above +2 or below -2 indicates extreme performance deviation from the mean.

P-Value
0.023
*

Probability this variance is due to random chance. Below 0.05 (*) means statistically significant - not just luck.

Understanding These Statistics

Regression Probability

High % (70%+) = very likely to change. Low % (20%-) = performance is sustainable. This tells you if the current form will last.

Z-Score

Measures extremeness. +2.0 = top 2.5% (extremely lucky). -2.0 = bottom 2.5% (extremely unlucky). Between -1 and +1 = normal.

P-Value

Below 0.05 marked with * = less than 5% chance this is random. Above 0.05 = could just be normal variance, not a real pattern.

*

Statistically Significant (*): This variance is NOT due to random chance (p-value < 0.05). The 15.4 point gap between actual and expected performance is a real, measurable pattern that will likely correct itself.

What This Means in Plain English

Wolves has earned 3 points from 19 matches (position #20).

However, based on the quality of chances they've created (17.2 xG) and conceded (27.7 xGA), statistical models predict they should have closer to 18.4 points (position #18).

This means they're getting 15.4 fewer points than their performance suggests - likely due to poor finishing (missing good chances) or unlucky goalkeeping (conceding from weak shots). The good news: This is usually temporary bad luck. Expect natural improvement as finishing/goalkeeping normalizes, without needing major tactical changes or expensive signings.

Bottom line: Don't panic about current position. Performance quality suggests improvement is coming naturally. Avoid hasty managerial changes - the issue is bad luck, not tactics.

Strategic Recommendations

Underperforming: Expected to improve naturally. Review finishing efficiency.

i

Key Insight: Expected position based on xG is #18, current position is #20.